Audit history · refreshed every block
Every mint, every burn, every reversal — public.
The audit log is the chain. There is no separate audit database. Every event below is a real chain transaction; click any row to inspect it on the explorer with full provenance.
Recent audit determinations
The latest 24 events on the audit lane.
Showing 12 of 9,234 events in the last 24 hours · Open the explorer for the full feed →
Audit committee
Who reviews fraud findings.
Five-seat committee of the Trust Council. Two academic seats, two clinician seats, one patient-advocate seat. Three-of-five quorum required to enter a fraud finding. Findings are themselves chain transactions and are reviewable on appeal.
S. Kazemi, MD PhD
Chair · academic
Stanford · cardiology · health-policy
D. Marquez, MD
Clinician seat
Texas · primary care · 18 yrs practice
T. Okonkwo, RN MPH
Clinician seat
Pennsylvania · adherence research
How a fraud case actually moves
Anatomy of an audit determination.
Day 0 · Signal
Anomaly detector flags clinician X-742
Mint volume on the ER axis is 4.2σ above peer-group baseline for the same specialty and panel size. Detector raises an INVESTIGATE flag. No mints are paused at this stage.
Day 1–3 · Triage
Audit-committee staff pulls a sample
Staff pulls 30 of clinician X-742's last 90 mints, blinded to identity, and sends to two independent specialist reviewers. Reviewers attest whether the documentation supports the lift on each axis.
Day 8 · Determination
14 of 30 reviewed mints are unsupported
Committee meets, reviews findings. Vote 4–1 to enter a fraud finding. Determination is signed and pinned to the chain.
Day 8 · Burn
14 reversed mints become burn entries
Compensating burn transactions zero the 14 affected wallets. The original mint events remain on the ledger; the wallets net to zero on those events. Affected patients are notified by their guardian-orb inbox with full case detail and an appeal path.
Day 14 · Public
Determination is published in plain language
Redacted case summary appears here on this page and in the public chain explorer. Identifies are anonymised; mechanism is fully described.
Day 14–60 · Appeal window
Clinician and affected patients may appeal
Appeal goes to a different five-seat panel. If the appeal succeeds, the burn is itself burned (the chain shows both the burn and the burn-of-burn) and the wallet is restored.